Saturday, December 30, 2006

The Renovation of Tyranny



Let me start, very clearly, by saying that I do NOT believe that Saddam Hussein was any sort of a saint, or a hero. The man was a shit, plain and simple-- Mean spirited and megalomaniacal, in a way that 3rd world dictators are when they come to power without any system of checks and balances. . .I have no doubt in my mind that he was guilty of horrendous crimes against the Kurds, and against Shiite insurgents. he tortured and killed people, without mercy, and without due process.

That having been said. . .

Saddam Hussein was not executed for gassing the Kurds--that trial was never completed, and he was not found guilty for that crime.

Hussein was executed for the slaughter at Dujail, which he had his soldiers kill pretty much the whole village after an assassination attempt while he was visiting there. he was pretty ruthless and brutal, but then again, despots usually are.

The things that strike me as unjust are this:

1) Hussein was removed from power and subsequently arrested by an illegally occupying government. Considering the absence of WMD's (used as the justification for the invasion of Iraq), there was no legal justification for the US military to remove him from power and subsequently arrest him and hold him for trial.

2) The tribunal which tried Hussein could hardly be described as a just and impartial tribunal. It's by-laws prevented anyone but Hussein's political opponents from serving as a judge. This seems hardly just or fair.

3) The charges that he was executed for were based around a brutal retaliation against an attack upon him and his allies. Who are we, who have pretty much bombed the crap out of the country of Afghanistan, killing countless civilians, in retaliation for the 9/11 attacks guilty of anything less than Hussein's "crimes against Humanity" in Dujail? If the killing of innocents in retaliation for politically motivated terrorist attacks is the litmus test for hanging a leader, then we had better start looking closer to home.

4) One could say that he deserved to be executed for other things, such as the genocide against the Kurds--and that may well be, however, Hussein was not found guilty for those crimes. . .that verdict had not (and now never will) come in. If that HAD been grounds for execution, then his co-conspirators, the US government under the Reagan and Bush SR. administrations, who supported him before, during, and after the massacre of the Kurds in 1988 should be held accountable as well, as they acted in collusion by not only providing the technology for the WMD's used in those attacks, but assisted in covering those acts up, making public statements to lay blame at the feet of the Iranians, rather than the Hussein regime, who was our ally at that time.

To be honest with you, the whole thing makes me pretty sick. Not because I am against the Death penalty, which I am not, if it can be applied justly and impartially (which it usually fails to do), nor because I think that Hussein was "innocent". the fact is, I think he was a ruthless dictator who has the blood of countless innocents on his hands. . .

The whole thing makes me sick because our country, which is supposed to stand for truth, justice, fairness, etc has been a party to yet more criminal behavior. . .the execution of someone without a fair trial, without reasonable due process, is NOT something for us, as Americans, to be proud of. Justice has NOT been served by the death of this man. We have only dug our hole deeper. . .We have only befouled the precepts that we claim to promote.

it seems very clear to me that we have not removed Tyranny, but have renovated it into something with a better image. . .we have simply replaced it with a form of tyranny that is more acceptable to our western sensibilities--a tyranny that most of us are able to sleep with at night.

Most of us, not all of us. . .

and not me.

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Evil will always be on this earth.
There will always be things that are unjust and unfair.
There will always be things that we just dont understand.
Saddam got what he deserved... death.

11:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He had a trial- he was found guilty... not by the USA, but by his own courts.

Are you anti-USA?

12:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sound reasoning. If we were able to sentence every leader of a nation to death because they deserved it, I doubt if there would be many left standing.

As evil as he was, it would have been wiser to leave him where he was before the invasion of Iraq. He was effectively neutralised by the work of the UN.

Thomas, are you aware of the David Hicks case? He is an internee of Guantonomo.


Regards, Leo

2:14 AM  
Blogger Thomas J. said...

Anon #1--

Just because evil will always be on this earth does not mean that our government should be a party to it. Nor does it mean that we, citizens of a "free democracy" should smile and nod while there is injustice done. Did Saddam deserve death? Maybe so. . .in fact, probably. However, there are MANY who deserve death according to to the unsubstantiated opinions of others. It was about a year ago in which someone lectured me about how the murder of a child abuser was inappropriate, and that it was important to let the justice system do it's work. That person was ESPECIALLY focused on the ideas of extending grace and forgiveness. . .taking the high road, so to speak.

My point is, that the execution of Hussein amounts to little more than US sanctioned vigilantism. . .this is a dangerous road for any nation to be on.

8:07 AM  
Blogger Thomas J. said...

Anon #2

There are all kinds of people throughout history who are executed after having a trial (even Jesus Christ--and no, Saddam was no Jesus Christ). . .that is not the issue. . the question is did he have a FAIR trial.

No he was NOT found guilty by "his own courts". He was found guilty by the courts established by a government which was put in place by the US military, who is removed Hussein from office and set up another goverenmnt illegally--they had no legal justification for doing so.

Am I anti-usa? oh heavens no. . .in fact, I am far from it. . .i am very PRO USA. . .this is why I find it so sickening and disturbing for our great nation, which is supposed to be the bastion of freedom, democracy, and justice, to be a party to the kangaroo court and lynching of the leader of another country, regardless of how mean and evil that leader may be. Our actions in Iraq are motivated, not by a desire for freedom and justice, but of greed and the profit of American corporations. Hussein was removed from office to further the personal agendas of the current administration, not to further the goals of freedom and democracy.

since I am very PRO USA, it sickens me to see our great nation, and it's heroic military used to further the personal goals of a few, petty, greedy, individuals.

8:15 AM  
Blogger Thomas J. said...

Leo--

Just read up on the David Hicks case--GREAT example of someone who is NOT receiving justice at the hands of the US. I think that a discerning reader should not be surprised at the lengths that the US government will go to at this time. I am sickened that our great country is used to further the goals of a few, and that the bulk of it's citizens are too self centered and uninformed to realize what is going on.

8:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David Hick's father sometimes pops up in the news here. If ever I would go looking for an illustration for God's love for his own son, he would be it.

The man has thrown everything he had away to fight vitually alone against two indifferent governments to get his son back.

Leo

3:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You should check out this link on the subject from our good friend who used to live in Durham and is now in S. Africa.

http://twoandtwomakesfive.blogs.com/two_and_two_makes_five/2007/01/saddams_noose_a.html

For me, Saddam's death is more of a commentary on how much our world is lacking in GRACE, and how much we truly need the Jesus of the Gospels, not the Jesus of the Religious Right. (How's that for an inflammatory comment.) :-)

11:39 AM  
Blogger Thomas J. said...

Elisa. . .wonderful to have you post!!

A wonderful post you referenced, even for a "non-christian" like me. I agree that the bloodthirstiness of the religious right is disturbing, even frightening. . .I also find it appalling that those same people who preach Jesus as the "Prince of Peace" and the author of salvation, only want to extend that salvation to people who are white, upper-middle class Americans. According to Christian Theology, ALL people deserve death and damnation, so it seems strange to me that these very people would single out someone like Hussein as the target of their "vengance".

What you refer to as "Grace" I think of more in the terms of "Justice". It is unjust for collaborators in a crime to be party to the trial and execution of another member of the conspiracy. This is called a conflict of interest. Very simply, I don't think Hussein should have been executed because it is bad politics. If you start going around and having your enemies executed, then YOU become the tyrant.

So much for the dignity and sanctity of our nation.

8:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home